Will ChatGPT4 bring a societal impact?

Release time:2023-03-28

       It may lead to a sharp decline in population, and the premise for developing countries to increase their population is that the lower classes believe they have the possibility to change their fate or that society is in a spindle-shaped structure. These two premises are based on a more important premise: low per capita education level. Once the education level improves, even if in a spindle-shaped structure that is unfavorable to health, people will reduce their desire to have children because the upward channel is actually closed, especially in places with serious Confucian culture such as East Afghanistan, Japan, and South Korea. ChatGPT is more like a "wish machine", and it will work with some weak AI programs to achieve many things that would originally require complex human implementation, whether it is financial investment advice, legal documents, or even movie special effects, dubbing, illustrations, model photography, and even those standardized essays, it can quickly achieve them. In other words, the lower classes have lost the upward channel through hard work and intelligence, and the channel obtained through beauty is also closing... live streaming and film and television can achieve without real people, and the remaining value is not much. If they are all closed, why give birth? Do they continue to pay taxes to support them? In addition, ChatGPT is leading another wave of capital replacing labor. Many people use the examples of cars replacing horses and Apple replacing Nokia to argue that job positions will not decrease. However, they have not considered the fact that there are fewer horses and letter writing no longer exists. In the changes brought about by ChatGPT4, most people's roles are more like horses, which can be replaced by AI by the boss. The best case scenario is that you work harder and are kept to assist with AI in tasks that originally required four or five people. As for promotion and salary increase... sorry, non-irreplaceable old employees will only trigger the 35-year-old warning line. Similarly, in the relationship between countries, developing countries will no longer have the opportunity. The biggest population dividend of developing countries will be replaced by cheaper and more obedient AI, and without core technology, there is no possibility of overtaking on a bend.
  Our smart  locks also need to keep up with changes and become more intelligent, home-oriented, and AI-driven.